Overview
Rolling Stone’s UVA Rape Story refers to the online backlash surrounding the pop culture magazine’s investigative report that sought to expose the gang rape of “Jackie,” then an 18-years-old freshman student at the University of Virginia, allegedly carried out by seven members of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity on campus in the fall of 2012. Upon its print and online publication in November 2014, the validity of the victim’s claims as cited in the article soon came under intense scrutiny in the social media after the discovery of factual discrepancies and conflicting details in the accounts provided by the accuser and the fraternity.
Background
On November 19th, 2014, Rolling Stone published a feature investigative article titled “A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA" by staff reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely, which alleged that seven Phi Kappa Psi brothers at the University of Virginia brutally gang raped a female freshman student, who is only identified by her first name as “Jackie,” during a social gathering at their fraternity house held on the night of September 28th, 2012.
Notable Developments
University of Virginia’s Response
On November 20th, the University of Virginia Interfraternity Council (IFC) released a statement noting that an IFC officer had been interviewed by the Rolling Stone but that “the reporter elected not to include any of the information from the interview in her article.” On November 22nd, University of Virginia President Teresa A. Sullivan announced that the University was suspending all fraternities on campus until January 9th, 2014.
Criticism
On November 24th, Worth magazine editor in chief Richard Bradley published a blog post titled “Is the Rolling Stone Story True?”, which questioned the story’s authenticity and comparing it to the 2006 Duke lacrosse case. On November 27th, Slate published an interview with Erdely, in which she claimed she was unable to contact the accused men for the story due to the fraternity’s “outdated” contact page. On December 2nd, Slate published an article titled “The Missing Men,” noting that Erdely refused to answer follow-up questions about the story. That day, The Washington Post published an article titled “Rolling Stone whiffs in reporting on alleged rape,” which rejected Erdely’s excuse for not contacting the accused men:
“The charge in this piece, however, is gang rape, and so requires every possible step to reach out and interview them, including e-mails, phone calls, certified letters, FedEx letters, UPS letters and, if all of that fails, a knock on the door. No effort short of all that qualifies as journalism.”
Phi Kappa Psi’s Response
On December 5th, the Virginia chapter of Phi Kappa Psi issued a press release, which claimed no fraternity member matched the description of the lifeguard in the story, denied having a social event during the weekend of September 28th, 2012 and revealed that their pledging and initiation periods took place during the spring semester (shown below).
Rolling Stone’s Apology
On December 5th, 2014, Will Dana, the managing editor of Rolling Stone, issued an official response in an article titled “A Note to Our Readers, in which Dana apologized to the readers on behalf of the magazine for their admitted oversight on fact-checking and failure to include any account or statement from the alleged assaulters (shown below). On December 7th, Rolling Stone updated the apology letter with a full acknowledgment of their mistake by stating “these mistakes are on Rolling Stone, not on Jackie.”
“In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie’s account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced… Because of the sensitive nature of Jackie’s story, we decided to honor her request not to contact the man she claimed orchestrated the attack on her nor any of the men she claimed participated in the attack for fear of retaliation against her. In the months Erdely spent reporting the story, Jackie neither said nor did anything that made Erdely, or Rolling Stone‘s editors and fact-checkers, question Jackie’s credibility.”
News Media Coverage
In the coming days, several news sites published articles criticizing Rolling Stone for its poor journalistic practices and for blaming a source for their own errors, including Fortune, Washington Post, The New Yorker, Fox News and The Daily Mail.
Search Interest
External References